ArticlemSystems2026
Metagenome-assembled genomes from a population-based cohort uncover novel gut species and within-species diversity, revealing prevalent disease associations.
Article in mSystems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metagenomic profiling has advanced the understanding of microbe-host interactions. However, widely used read-based approaches are limited by incomplete reference databases and the inability to resolve strain-level variation. Here, we present a scalable, genome-resolved framework that integrates population-specific metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) to discover novel species, within-species diversity, and disease associations. From 1,878 deeply sequenced samples in the Estonian Microbiome Cohort (EstMB-deep), we reconstructed 84,762 MAGs representing 2,257 species, including 353 (15.6%) previously uncharacterized species reaching up to 30% relative abundances in some individuals. We integrated these MAGs with the Unified Human Gastrointestinal Genome collection to create an expanded reference (GUTrep), enabling profiling of 2,509 EstMB individuals and testing associations with 33 prevalent diseases. Of the 25 diseases with significant associations, 8 involved newly identified species, underscoring the value of population-specific MAGs. To quantify within-species diversity, we developed the genome unit number (GUN), a novel MAG-based metric that informed within-species analyses. Based on normalized GUN, we prioritized IMPORTANCE: Microbiome studies increasingly recognize that species-level profiles can mask critical within-species differences relevant to health and disease. However, our work shows that within-species diversity varies drastically across gut microbes, with some species exhibiting almost as many distinct within-species clusters as recovered genomes, making association studies at the within-species level essentially intractable. To address this, we introduce the genome unit number (GUN), a scalable metric for quantifying within-species structure. Using GUN, we demonstrate that only species with limited within-species diversity, such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.