Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838297›Full record

ReviewCurrent neurology and neuroscience reports2026

Prevention and Treatment of ICU Delirium in Brain Injured Patients.

Thomas Lawson, Bethany C Young, Michael E Reznik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thomas LawsonDepartment of Neurology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Bethany C YoungDepartment of Neurology, Division of Neurocritical Care, Virtua Our Lady of Lourdes Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
Michael E ReznikDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3550 Terrace Street, Scaife Hall, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA, 15206, USA. michael.reznik@pitt.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewDelirium is highly prevalent after acute brain injury and is associated with poor outcomes, yet neurocritically ill patients remain underrepresented in delirium research. This review examines recent evidence and current challenges in delirium detection, prevention, and treatment in patients with acute neurological injury. RECENT

findingsCommonly used ICU delirium screening tools such as the CAM-ICU and ICDSC demonstrate reduced accuracy in patients with severe neurological deficits, while newer tools like the FMSE show promise in neurocritically ill populations. Multicomponent non-pharmacologic interventions remain central to delirium management, while pharmacological strategies have been aimed at minimizing risks, as clinical trials of most pharmacological delirium treatments have largely shown no benefit. However, data specific to neurocritical care settings remain limited. Delirium management in ICU patients with acute brain injury is often adapted from other patient populations, though there have been recent efforts to harmonize delirium assessment methods in neurocritical care settings. With the increasing awareness of delirium and its clinical implications in patients with acute brain injury, more studies are needed to develop preventive and therapeutic approaches tailored to this highly vulnerable patient population.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesCritical CareDeliriumIntensive Care UnitsHumansAcute brain injuryDeliriumNeurocritical care

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.