SynthesisObesity surgery2026
Patients with Obesity Undergoing Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Fundoplication for Refractory GERD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) significantly impairs quality of life and is associated with complications such as Barrett’s esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Obesity exacerbates GERD pathophysiology by elevating intra-abdominal pressure, making treatment more difficult. Current evidence suggests that Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) offers superior outcomes compared to fundoplication in patients with severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m²). This review aims to critically evaluate fundoplication versus RYGB in the population with obesity and GERD.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. We performed a comprehensive search across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies comparing fundoplication versus RYGB in patients with obesity and GERD. Data extraction was standardized, focusing on intraoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, reoperation, postoperative complications, postoperative dysphagia, and DeMeester score. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane RevMan (Review Manager 9.7.1), employing random-effects models. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q test and I² statistic.
resultsThe analysis included 7 observational studies. We found no differences in complication rates after sensitivity analysis. There were no differences in dysphagia, reoperation rate, operative time and length of stay. At a weighted mean follow-up of 42.3 months (range: 19.6 to 52.0) for fundoplication and 35.2 months (range: 14.6 to 49.0) for RYGB, GERD resolution, measured by the DeMeester score, slightly favored fundoplication, although the absolute difference was not clinically relevant. Regarding weight outcomes, RYGB demonstrated significantly higher total weight loss (TWL) at the 12-month follow-up.
conclusionFundoplication appears statistically superior for GERD resolution postoperatively, but the difference is not clinically relevant. RYGB has a higher TWL. Both procedures are safe for GERD control in patients with obesity. The choice between procedures should weigh reflux severity, complication risks, and metabolic diseases associated with obesity. Larger studies are needed to clarify the impact of surgical timing and patient-specific factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.