Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41838370›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer survivorship : research and practice2026

A pilot study of a sexual health workshop for oncology staff: feasibility, impact, and gaps in addressing young adult breast cancer survivorship needs.

T J Rick, A Girard, A Topalian, J Hui, R J Jansen, A H Blaes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer survivorship : research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T J RickDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Rickx045@umn.edu.
A GirardUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Cancer Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
A TopalianDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Division of Survivorship and Supportive Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
J HuiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
R J JansenBiostatistics Core, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
A H BlaesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSexual health concerns are highly prevalent and distressing among adolescent and young adult (AYA) breast cancer survivors, yet are rarely addressed in routine oncology care. Lack of provider training remains a key barrier to effective communication and support. The purpose of the study was to determine whether a brief educational workshop for oncology staff improves sexual health screening rates among AYA breast cancer survivors, and evaluate the workshop's acceptability, feasibility, and impact on provider confidence.

methodsWe conducted a pilot multi-component study combining a mixed observational cohort and non-randomized interventional study. On May 20, 2024, eight breast cancer care team members-four advanced practice providers (APPs) and four registered nurse care coordinators (RNCCs)-participated in a "30-s message" communication workshop adapted from the All of Me program created by After Cancer. Medical charts of all eligible AYA breast cancer survivors aged 18-40 diagnosed within the previous 24 months were reviewed to assess changes in sexual health screening documentation before and six months post-intervention. Provider confidence, perceived importance of sexual health, and perceptions of feasibility and acceptability were evaluated via pre-, post-, and 6-month follow-up surveys.

resultsTwenty-two AYA breast cancer survivors were eligible for chart extraction. Prior to the intervention, 45% of patients had documented sexual health screening, with APPs responsible for nearly all documented cases. Screening rates did not increase following the workshop. Of the 12 patients not screened, 4 transferred care (33%), 5 saw an oncologist (41%), 1 saw an APP (8%), and 2 had other competing health issues occurring at the time of follow up that took priority of the visit (17%). All eight participating providers (4 APPs, 4 RNs) completed the training; 88% completed the immediate post-survey and 75% completed the six-month follow-up survey. Providers reported high acceptability and feasibility. Confidence in addressing physical symptoms was higher than managing emotional concerns (e.g., low desire).

conclusionsScreening rates did not increase following the workshop, likely reflecting high baseline APP screening and limited follow-up opportunities. Future efforts should integrate role-specific education with system-level supports to broaden and sustain screening practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Cancer survivors are often cared for by a multidisciplinary team. This study suggests that training only advanced practice providers and nurses may not be enough to improve sexual health screening. Broader education across all care team members, combined with system-wide tools and prompts, may be needed to ensure consistent and equitable survivorship care.

Indexed as

Adolescent and young adult (AYA)Breast cancerCancer survivorsOncosexologyPsychosexualQuality of lifeScreeningSexual healthTraining workshop

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.