Evidence mapPaperPMID 41838732Full record

ReviewPLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

The human immunome in the post-schistosomiasis mass drug administration era.

Emilee J Benos, Francisca Mutapi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Plant-Derived Terpenes as Emerging Therapeutics Against Schistosomiasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emilee J BenosInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7764-9769
Francisca MutapiInstitute of Immunology and Infection Research, University of Edinburgh, Ashworth Laboratories, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Helminths have co-evolved with humans and developed sophisticated mechanisms to manipulate the host immune system, allowing them to persist for years. During chronic disease, helminths typically shift immune responses toward a Th2 profile-supporting antibody production and tissue repair-while suppressing Th1/Th17 responses that are crucial for combating viruses and intracellular pathogens. Additionally, they elevate regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β, dampening inflammation, compromising host immunity to other infections, and, in some cases, reducing vaccine efficacy. Further, both experimental and clinical studies have shown that anthelminthic treatment can reverse parasite host immunomodulation. However, there is evidence that helminth-induced immune changes may persist months after parasite clearance. With the widespread rollout of preventive chemotherapy via mass drug administration (MDA) across the continent, many African populations have now received at least one round of deworming treatment. This raises critical questions about the nature, persistence, and public health significance of anthelminthic treatment-related immunological shifts in endemic settings with repeated exposures. In Africa, which bears a disproportionate share of the global helminth burden, there is growing interest in how these factors shape immune responses. In this review, we summarise current knowledge and key research gaps regarding mechanisms that contribute to immune variation in helminth-endemic populations and the broader implications for disease control, vaccine response, and health policy in endemic settings.

Indexed as

AnthelminticsHelminthiasisMass Drug AdministrationSchistosomiasisAfricaAnimalsHumansAnthelmintics

Identifiers

PMID41838732
PMCPMC12991282

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.