ArticleClinical and translational science2026
Kidney Effectiveness and Safety of Adding Spironolactone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Therapy.
Article in Clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We evaluated the renal outcomes and safety of spironolactone added to renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASis) among patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), given its uncertain role alongside RASis, the cornerstone of T2D with renal disease management. In this retrospective study at National Cheng Kung University Hospital (2014-2021), we identified adult T2D patients receiving RASis alone or combined with spironolactone. Propensity score matching between treatment groups was implemented to achieve between-group comparability. The primary outcome was a composite renal outcome (including end-stage renal disease [ESRD], renal transplant, or a ≥ 30% estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] decline). Secondary outcomes included proteinuria, major adverse cardiovascular events, and hyperkalemia. Cox proportional hazard model analyses were adopted to assess the treatment outcomes. 404 PS-matched pairs of RASis-alone and RASis+spironolactone users were included. Adding spironolactone to RASis was associated with increased composite renal event (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 1.27 [1.06-1.51]), persistent eGFR decline ≥ 30% (1.31 [1.09-1.58]), and hyperkalemia (1.57 [1.21-2.04]) risks while associated with a higher likelihood of achieving ≥ 30% proteinuria reduction (HR 1.34 [1.12-1.60]). Having heart failure (HF) was a significant effect modifier, that is, using RASis+spironolactone versus RASis alone was associated with a lower ESRD/renal transplant risk among patients with HF (0.62 [0.38-1.02]) but an increased risk for those without HF (1.32 [0.98-1.78]) (p for interaction = 0.011). Adding spironolactone to RASis might increase renal adverse events and hyperkalemia but reduce proteinuria in T2D patients. Notably, heart failure status significantly modified these associations, underscoring the importance of personalized medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.