Trial reportNature communications2026
Durvalumab and cediranib with and without olaparib in recurrent ovarian cancer: a phase II proof-of-concept study.
Trial report in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02484404 (Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Antibody Durvalumab), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Antibody Durvalumab (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Cancers
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Here we report the efficacy and translational findings of durvalumab, olaparib, and cediranib (D + O + C) and of durvalumab plus cediranib (D + C) from the recurrent ovarian cancer cohort within a single-center, multi-arm, non-randomized, multi-cohort phase I/II trial (NCT02484404). Sixty-eight patients were enrolled (39 in D + O + C, 29 in D + C). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. ORR was 19.4% (95% CI, 9.5-43.5) for D + O + C and 29.6% (95% CI, 13.8-46.9) for D + C; D + C met the primary endpoint while D + O + C did not. Median PFS was 4.5 months in both arms, with four exceptional responders (PFS ≥ 12 months) per arm. Toxicity was manageable. Pre- and on-treatment biopsies and blood samples were collected for prespecified transcriptomic and immunophenotypic profiling; signature analyses and preclinical studies were conducted post hoc and were exploratory. Baseline tumors from exceptional responders and patients with clinical benefit (partial response or stable disease with PFS ≥ 4 months) demonstrated enrichment of immune activation and metabolic pathways, whereas tumors with no clinical benefit (NCB; progressive disease or stable disease with PFS < 4 months) exhibited upregulation of vascular adaptation and cytoskeletal remodeling pathways. These findings support the proof-of-concept clinical activity of D + O + C and D + C and identify molecular signatures with potential predictive value in subsets of recurrent ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.