Evidence mapPaperPMID 41840002Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Extraction and characterization of grapefruit wall material (Citrus paradise) and its impact on organoleptic properties of bread.

Farhan Saeed, Habiba Arooj, Bushra Niaz, Amara Rasheed, Faiyaz Ahmed, Murodjon Yaxshimuratov, Norbek Kholboyev, Mariam Islam, Hamna Zafar, Muhammad Afzaal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Farhan SaeedDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan. f.saeed@gcuf.edu.pk.
Habiba AroojDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Bushra NiazDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Amara RasheedDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan. ammarasheikh409@gmail.com.
Faiyaz AhmedDepartment of Basic Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, P.O. Box 6666, 51452, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia.
Murodjon YaxshimuratovDepartment of Chemistry, Urgench State University, Urgench, Uzbekistan.
Norbek KholboyevDepartment of Medicine, Termez University of Economics and Service, Termez, Uzbekistan.
Mariam IslamDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Hamna ZafarDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad AfzaalDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Fakhar IslamDepartment of Food Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Pakistan.
Catherine Tamale NdagireDepartment of Food Innovation and Nutrition, Mountains of the Moon University, Fort Portal, Uganda. catherinendagire@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The utilization of fruit by-products in bakery products has gained increasing attention due to their nutritional and functional potential. This study investigated the nutritional composition, and functional properties of grapefruit wall material and to evaluate its impact on bread quality. In the first phase the nutritional composition (including moisture, ash, protein, fat, fiber and total carbohydrates) of grapefruit peel powder was determined following the methods given in AACC. Then, in the second phase wall material was extracted using the alkali extraction method and characterized for the determination of structure through scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Furthermore, the flavonoid and phenolic content were quantified, and antioxidant activity was evaluated through DPPH and FRAP. In the last phase, bread was prepared using different concentrations of wall material (T0, T1, T2 = 0 g, 2 g, and 4 g) to evaluate its effects on texture, color, and sensory attributes. Initially, chemical composition of grapefruit peels revealed 76% moisture, 0.81% ash, 6.04% crude fat, 2.56% crude protein, 6.96% crude fiber, and 8.17% nitrogen-free extract. The results showed that increased wall material reduced hardness and chewiness but enhanced cohesiveness, springiness, and adhesiveness after two days of storage. Higher GFWM concentrations also decreased L* values, resulting in darker bread color. Bread prepared with the treatment (T2) achieved the highest sensory acceptability. The incorporation of GFWM enhanced the nutritional and textural qualities of bread, showing its potential as a functional ingredient in cereal-based formulations.

Indexed as

BreadCitrus paradisiPlant ExtractsAntioxidantsDietary FiberFlavonoidsFruitHumansNutritive ValuePhenolsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredAntioxidantsDietary FiberFlavonoidsPhenolsPlant ExtractsAgricultural wasteAntioxidantBreadGrapefruit wall materialTexture

Identifiers

PMID41840002
PMCPMC13125505

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.