ArticleScientific reports2026
Three-dimensional passive acoustic mapping of high intensity focused ultrasound fields using sparse synthetic apertures from rotated one-dimensional linear arrays.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate visualization of the focal spot in high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) is essential for safe and effective therapeutic guidance. Passive acoustic mapping (PAM) provides a noninvasive method for reconstructing acoustic fields from scattered signals generated as HIFU pulses interact with tissue inhomogeneities. This study introduces a synthetic aperture strategy for three-dimensional beam reconstruction by mechanically rotating a one-dimensional linear ultrasound probe. Five synthetic configurations were assessed: 1D Linear, Cross Linear, Discrete Annular, Random Sparse, and Fibonacci Spiral. Each was formed by rotating a 64-element probe at predefined angles. A Full Aperture Array was included as a reference baseline. The Fibonacci Spiral Array achieved the most balanced performance among the synthetic configurations, combining high structural similarity (SSIM = 0.711 in X-Y) with strong sidelobe suppression (PSL = -12.538 dB in Y-Z), low mean squared error, and consistently high output quality across all evaluated planes. These results closely matched those of the Full Aperture Array, supporting similar resolution and localization accuracy. These findings indicate that spiral-based sampling provides a hardware-efficient, high-fidelity solution for volumetric PAM in therapeutic ultrasound, offering a practical alternative to conventional two-dimensional matrix arrays.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.