Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840063›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of pediatrics2026

The breath and mind connection in young people with post-COVID syndrome: feasibility and acceptability of a pilot randomised co-designed intervention.

Charlotte Wells, Deborah Christie, Rebecca Johnston, Faye Knight, Monica Samuel, Terry Y Segal, Mark Shevlin, Rachel Sparrow, Deborah Woodman, Samatha Sonnappa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Charlotte WellsUniversity of Suffolk, Ipswich, UK. c.wells7@uos.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-5892
Deborah ChristieDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Rebecca JohnstonGuys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Faye KnightGuys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Monica SamuelDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Terry Y SegalDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark ShevlinDepartment of Psychology, Ulster University, Coleraine, Northern Ireland.
Rachel SparrowDepartment of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Deborah WoodmanGuys and St Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Samatha SonnappaDepartment of Respiratory Paediatrics, The Royal Brompton Hospital part of Guy's and ST Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-COVID syndrome is widely recognised in children and young people (CYP), where one or more persistent physical symptoms are present 12 weeks after the initial infection that cannot be explained by an alternative cause. We aimed to assess whether an intervention based on narrative therapy and breathing pattern retraining, co-designed with CYP with PCS (12-18 years) was feasible and acceptable within an NHS service. Participants were randomised to standard clinical care or intervention plus standard clinical care. The primary aim was to assess acceptability and feasibility within the study cohort. Intervention effects were evaluated using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) Impact Score,with additional secondary outcomes included the Nijmegen questionnaire, Chandler Fatigue, and EQ-5D-Y, wellness rating, pulmonary function, and exercise testing. Thirty-two CYP were randomised to standard treatment (n = 15) or intervention (n = 17), mean age of 15 years, and 11 (34%) male. Twenty-seven (84%) were diagnosed with breathing pattern disorders. Four intervention groups were offered over 6 months. 14/17 completed the session. Qualitative feedback was positive. There was no statistically significant improvement in the SDQ over time or between groups. Nearly all secondary outcome measures showed statistically significant improvement over time (< 0.001) but not between groups. Conclusions: The intervention was acceptable and feasible to run in an NHS clinic setting for CYP with post-COVID syndrome. Significant improvements seen with time in secondary outcome measures in both groups indicate that post-COVID symptoms improve with time independent of the intervention. What is known - What is new: • Post-COVID syndrome (PCS) affects up to 66.5% of children and young people (CYP) with common persistent or fluctuating symptoms of fatigue, headaches, anxiety, brain fog, breathlessness, and post-exertional malaise and symptom exacerbation. • Few interventions have sought to address both the physical and mental health impact of PCS in adults and the evidence remains limited for CYP. • This novel psychology/physiotherapy co-designed intervention is acceptable and feasible in an NHS clinic setting. • We identified that breathing pattern disorders are common and a predominant cause of breathlessness in teenagers with PCS.

Indexed as

Breathing ExercisesPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeAdolescentChildFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMalePilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesBreathing retrainingNarrative therapyPost-COVID syndromeYoung people

Identifiers

PMID41840063
PMCPMC12992349

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.