ArticleScientific reports2026
Risk factors for postextubation pneumonia using diagnosis procedure combination and claims data in Japan.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intubation-related pneumonia negatively affects patient outcomes. Aspiration pneumonia occurring after extubation due to swallowing dysfunction, conceptualized as postextubation pneumonia (PEP), remains underrecognized as a distinct clinical entity. This single-center, retrospective study aimed to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for PEP using large-scale diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) and administrative claims data. We reviewed all patients who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia between April 2016 and March 2023. Patients undergoing emergency surgery or lacking data on activities of daily living (ADL) or body mass index (BMI) were excluded. Patients who developed pneumonia after extubation and required newly initiated antibiotic therapy were classified as PEP cases. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) cases were identified according to standard definitions. Among 31 828 eligible patients, 212 (0.67%) developed PEP, which occurred more frequently than VAP. Risk factors for PEP included advanced age, male sex, low BMI, impaired consciousness, and reduced ADL. Surgical sites associated with PEP included the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory system, thoracic cavity, cardiovascular and nervous systems, and head, neck, and face. Smoking status was not significantly associated with PEP. These findings highlight PEP as a clinically important and potentially preventable complication. Targeted dysphagia screening and perioperative multidisciplinary interventions may help reduce its incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.