Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41840304›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2026

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Scoping Review of Implementation Strategies, Clinical Outcomes, and Health System Impact.

Lucas Ferreira Gomes Pereira, José Eduardo Guimarães Pereira, Vinicius Caldeira Quintão, Luiz Fernando Dos Reis Falcão, Bruno Araújo Borges, Bruce Biccard, Carlos Darcy Alves Bersot

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lucas Ferreira Gomes PereiraDiscipline of Anesthesiology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7802-8877
José Eduardo Guimarães PereiraDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital Unimed Volta Redonda, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Vinicius Caldeira QuintãoDiscipline of Anesthesiology, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6459-7983
Luiz Fernando Dos Reis FalcãoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain and Critical Care Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina-Universidade Federal de São Paulo (EPM-UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno Araújo BorgesDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital DF Star, Brasília, Brazil.
Bruce BiccardDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Carlos Darcy Alves BersotDepartment of Anesthesiology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-7990

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs are increasingly recognized as effective pathways to improve perioperative outcomes, yet their implementation across Latin America and the Caribbean remains poorly mapped. Understanding current strategies, clinical results, and economic implications is essential to identify regional gaps and guide evidence-based surgical improvement.

methodsThis scoping review followed Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology and PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, LILACS, and CENTRAL, complemented by gray literature and reference screening. Eligible studies were investigations evaluating perioperative optimization interventions in any surgical population within Latin America and the Caribbean. Data extraction included study characteristics, ERAS components, implementation strategies, clinical outcomes, and economic impact.

resultsForty-five studies published between 2006 and 2025 were included, predominantly from Brazil (n = 28), Mexico (n = 9), Argentina (n = 4), and Chile (n = 3). Most studies implemented multimodal perioperative pathways, with the most frequent ERAS strategies being preoperative fasting abbreviation (n = 26), early refeeding (n = 22), early mobilization (n = 22), opioid-sparing anesthesia (n = 19), preoperative education (n = 16), and restrictive intravenous fluids (n = 16). Clinical outcomes consistently demonstrated reductions in postoperative length of stay and complications. Only five studies reported economic data, all focused on hospital-level costs, showing decreased expenditures primarily driven by shorter hospitalization.

conclusionsERAS initiatives are increasing across Latin America and the Caribbean, with evidence suggesting reductions in hospital stay and costs. Nevertheless, adoption remains uneven and concentrated in a few countries. Expanding implementation will require addressing structural disparities and generating stronger economic and implementation-focused evidence to support broader regional uptake.

Indexed as

Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryCaribbean RegionHumansLatin AmericaLength of StayCaribbeanenhanced recovery after surgeryfast‐track surgeryhealth systemsLatin Americaperioperative care

Identifiers

PMID41840304
PMCPMC13070448

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.