ArticleBMC plant biology2026
Mitigation of arsenic and crude oil stress in tomato plants through microbial modulation of physiological and molecular responses.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rising population, climate change, and human activities intensify abiotic stress in plants. Conventional methods, such as chemical use and breeding, pose ecological risks. This study explores sustainable bioremediation using fungi and bacteria to enhance tomato plant resilience against arsenic and crude oil stress. Results showed that microbial inoculation significantly improved plant growth by enhancing stress tolerance and physiological functions such as water content and photosynthesis. Additionally, it reduced oxidative stress markers, indicating improved plant health. The roots of stressed seedlings showed significant anatomical differences compared to the control group, with stress-induced tissue damage and deformation of root epidermal cells affecting nutrient and water absorption. Additionally, our analysis of gene expression under arsenic and crude oil stress, with and without the introduction of microbial strains MGRF2, SL1, and SPSB2, revealed that microbial inoculation generally downregulated the expression of the examined genes under normal conditions. Different microbial strains respond uniquely to arsenic and crude oil stress by altering gene expression. Specifically, they upregulate genes associated with signaling pathways such as JA, heavy metal tolerance, and DREB, potentially reducing toxicity. Microbial strains MGRF2, SL1, and SPSB2 offer eco-friendly solutions by easing stress and enhancing plant growth for sustainable agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.