ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2026
Identification of key influencing factors of health information literacy in COPD patients: a cross-sectional study using a random forest model.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a substantial global health burden, and COPD management is closely associated with patients’ health information literacy (HIL). Given the multifactorial and potentially nonlinear relationships underlying HIL, traditional analyses may be limited in capturing these complex patterns. We applied machine learning to identify key predictors of HIL to inform targeted interventions.
methodsWe recruited 432 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from respiratory outpatient clinics in six tertiary hospitals in Hunan Province, China, between December 2023 and December 2024. Data were collected using a general information questionnaire, the Health Information Literacy Questionnaire, and the COPD Self-Management Scale. A random forest model was used to rank candidate predictors, and LASSO regression was used for variable selection.
resultsThe mean HIL score was 15.22 ± 2.44, and 16.9% of participants had adequate HIL (≥ 60). Random forest model and LASSO regression identified self-management as the most influential predictor of HIL, followed by age and education level (P < 0.05). In multivariable linear regression, higher self-management and education level were associated with higher HIL, whereas older age was associated with lower HIL (all P < 0.05), explaining 56.7% of the variance in HIL (adjusted R²=0.567).
conclusionHIL among COPD patients was suboptimal. Information search is emerging as the weakest domain. Self-management, age, and educational level were independently associated with HIL. Interventions should prioritize modifiable targets—particularly strengthening self-management skills and delivering age-friendly, literacy-sensitive education for older and less-educated patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.