ArticleBMC chemistry2026
Sustainability-based assessment using HPLC method for estimation of colchicine and dexamethasone for multi-disease treatment: application to laboratory-made combination and rat plasma.
Article in BMC chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveColchicine (COL) and dexamethasone (DEX) are well-established anti-inflammatory agents with proven efficacy across a spectrum of conditions, including gout, familial Mediterranean fever, cardiovascular diseases, and COVID-19. Their combined therapeutic use offers a synergistic effect that enhances inflammation control and immune modulation. Consequently, this study aimed to develop and validate a simple, sensitive, and sustainability-oriented HPLC-DAD method for the simultaneous determination of COL and DEX in laboratory-made tablets and rat plasma, and to perform a multi-tool assessment of the method's environmental and innovative performance. METHODOLOGY: Chromatographic separation was achieved on a reversed-phase long C8 column using acetonitrile:0.025 M phosphate buffer (pH 3) (40:60, v/v) at 1.0 mL/min using DAD tuned at 240 nm. Working ranges were 0.25-20 µg/mL (laboratory mixtures) and 1-20 µg/mL (plasma calibration with IS). Sample preparation for plasma employed protein precipitation with acetonitrile, centrifugation, evaporation, and reconstitution (300 µL). Method validation followed ICH and FDA bioanalytical guidance. KEY
findingsThe proposed method enabled the rapid and efficient separation of COL and DEX, yielding well-resolved peaks within 5 min and an excellent chromatographic performance. The method exhibited outstanding linearity (r > 0.999), high sensitivity, and reliable precision (intra- and inter-day RSD ≤ 6.25%), with extraction recoveries exceeding 85% in plasma. The sustainability assessment confirmed the environmentally friendly nature of the method, achieving high scores using multiple assessment metrics (Analytical Eco-Scale = 86; AGREE = 0.76; BAGI = 72.5; RGB model whiteness = 91.7). In addition, the violet innovation grade index (VIGI = 55) indicated a notable level of innovation, and the Environmental, Performance, and Practicality Index (EPPI = 87) indicated a high level of environmental sustainability, analytical efficiency, and real-world applicability. IMPACT: This is the first reported chromatographic method enabling simultaneous quantification of COL and DEX in pharmaceutical and plasma matrices together with a comprehensive, multi-tool sustainability assessment (including VIGI and EPPI). The method's short run time, high sensitivity, and favorable sustainability scores support its application in routine quality control and preclinical pharmacokinetic studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.