ArticlePsycho-oncology2026
Survey of Sleep Practices Among Clinicians Working With Pediatric Oncology Patients.
Article in Psycho-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePediatric cancer patients are at increased risk for sleep disturbances; however, there are no clinical practice guidelines for treating sleep disturbances in pediatric oncology, resulting in variable approaches to sleep management across clinicians. The current study surveyed clinicians regarding their approaches to assessing and treating sleep.
methodsA total of 200 pediatric oncology clinicians participated in a REDCap survey about behavioral and medical sleep concerns assessed in their practice and related treatment approaches.
resultsMost clinicians (61%) reported assessing sleep when patients or families raised a concern, and 10% reported never assessing sleep. Clinicians rated behavioral difficulties with sleep onset (M = 3.00, SD = 1.08) and insomnia (M = 2.91, SD = 0.99) as the most problematic sleep concerns. Sleep hygiene was the most widely endorsed intervention across almost every sleep concern. Behavioral strategies were used with similar frequency between physicians/APPs compared to other clinicians [ORs = 0.61-1.25]. Pharmacology was used more frequently by physicians/APPs than other clinicians for behavioral sleep concerns [ORs = 0.19-0.36].
conclusionsRelying on children and families to report concerns can be a missed opportunity to identify sleep disturbances early. The most endorsed treatment, sleep hygiene, is likely ineffective as a standalone treatment for complex sleep disturbances seen in oncology. It is possible that offering patients these simple but likely ineffective treatments alone may perpetuate long-term sleep disturbances and a lack of confidence in the ability to effectively treat sleep. Further research is needed to determine the most effective treatment approaches for behavioral sleep disturbances, informing clinical practice guidelines for pediatric oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.