ArticleJournal of clinical apheresis2026
Twenty Years of Therapeutic Leukocytapheresis in Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Insights From A Single Center.
Article in Journal of clinical apheresis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematologic malignancy, and 5%-20% of newly diagnosed patients present with hyperleukocytosis (HL). HL, most often defined as WBC > 100 000/μL, is a hematologic emergency associated with severe complications, early mortality, and poor prognosis, requiring immediate intervention. From November 2005 to September 2025, 65 newly diagnosed AML patients with HL underwent leukocytapheresis (LCP) at University Hospital Olomouc. Clinical data were retrospectively collected from medical records. The primary objective was to evaluate the procedural efficacy and safety. Clinical and laboratory data were analyzed. Survival outcomes were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Median age at diagnosis was 57 years. Dyspnea (60.0%), neuropsychiatric symptoms (31.7%), and visual impairment (6.2%) were the most common leukostasis manifestations. LCP effectively reduced WBC counts without significant adverse events, median of 2.2 TBV was treated, and 52.3% of the patients requiring more than one session. FLT3-ITD and NPM1 mutations were detected in 26/46 (56.5%) and 17/43 (39.5%), respectively, KMT2A rearrangements were present in 5/57 (8.8%). Intensive chemotherapy was feasible in 56.9% of patients, with 26.2% undergoing allo-HSCT. Median OS was 5.9 months (95% CI: 1.3-8.4), significantly longer in therapy-eligible patients, but outcomes remained poor, highlighting HL as an unmet clinical need. LCP remains a valuable therapeutic option for patients with HL in newly diagnosed AML. Our long-term experience supports its safety and efficacy, particularly in symptomatic patients, as a bridge to definitive therapy regardless of treatment intensity eligibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.