ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptoms in Female Runners: A Cross Sectional Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisFemale participation in long-distance running has been increasing, raising concern about pelvic floor-related symptoms in this population. However, data on pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms, particularly during running, remain limited. We hypothesized that higher training volume would be associated with greater prevalence of POP symptoms. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of POP symptoms and associated factors among Brazilian female runners.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, participants were recruited at road-running events and completed a questionnaire on demographics, health history, training characteristics, and other physical activities. POP symptoms were assessed by two questions: (1) "Do you notice a bulge or lump in your vagina in daily life situations, outside of physical exercise?" and (2) "Do you feel a sensation of pressure, bulge, or lump descending in your vagina while running?"
resultsThree hundred and one women met inclusion criteria (mean age 37.2 years). Twenty-three percent reported POP symptoms during running; 58% had a history of pregnancy, with mean values of 0.77 cesarean and 0.36 vaginal deliveries. Average weekly running distance was 28.6 km, and 76% performed additional physical activity (mean 1.98 sessions/week). POP symptoms were significantly associated with weekly running distance (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05) and additional activities (OR 1.53; 95% CI 1.22-1.91), while cesarean delivery was inversely associated (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.28-0.62).
conclusionsPOP symptoms were more frequent during running than in daily life. Weekly running distance and engagement in additional physical activity were significant predictors, whereas cesarean delivery appeared protective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.