Observational studyNeuroradiology2026
Impact of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors on intracranial aneurysm endovascular treatment outcome.
Observational study in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Application of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors in endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeAngiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) are commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications. They also possess antiplatelet properties. The aim of this single-center retrospective observational cohort study was to analyze whether intake of ACEis may increase the risk of incomplete aneurysm occlusion after this treatment modality.
methodsWe retrospectively included patients hospitalized between January 2015 and June 2024 with unruptured intracranial aneurysm, who underwent endovascular treatment with coiling or Flow Diverter (FD) placement. Imaging data (at 6 months and 18 months follow-up) were collected. We gathered information about the occlusion status at both follow-up examinations. Univariate analysis was conducted using χ2 and t-tests, and multivariate analysis employed logistic regression.
resultsA total of 126 patients with 131 aneurysms were included in coiling group and 134 patients with 149 aneurysms were included in FD group. At baseline, ACEis were used by 49 patients in the coiling group and 40 patients in the flow diverter group. Patients treated with flow diversion or stent-assisted coiling received standard antiplatelet therapy and none were on oral anticoagulation. The most commonly used ACEis were ramipril (57.30%), perindopril (32.58%), and lisinopril (10.11%). Twenty-six aneurysms (19.9%) from the coiling group were recanalized on the first follow-up examination. Patients with recanalized aneurysms were significantly more likely to take ACEis (61.54% vs. 31.43%; p < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, the logistic regression model identified aneurysm ACEis intake (OR:3.65;95% CI:1.2–11.83;p = 0.02) as an independent predictor of aneurysm recanalization at the first follow-up. Sixty-eight aneurysms (45.64%) from the FD group were incompletely occluded at the first follow-up examination. Similarly to coiling group, patients with non-totally occluded aneurysms were more likely to take ACEis (36.76% vs. 18.51%;p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis, intake of ACEis (OR:2.86;95% CI:1.34–6.29;p < 0.01) significantly increased risk of incomplete occlusion at first follow-up.
conclusionsACEis intake might reduce the rate of total aneurysm occlusion after endovascular treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41843104What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.