ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2026
Comparison of associations of intake of ultra-processed and non-ultra-processed whole-grain foods with cardiometabolic risk measures in Australian and US adults.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEvidence suggests total ultra-processed food (UPF) consumption increases disease risk. As whole grains are health protective, their inclusion in UPF definitions warrants consideration. We aimed to quantify Australian and US whole-grain consumption by level of food processing and compare associations on cardiometabolic risk measures.
methodsA cross-sectional analysis of Australian (NNPAS 2011-12)(n = 7735) and US (NHANES 2015-18)(n = 8343) nationally representative 2d intake data. The Nova classification system determined levels of processing. Mean and median whole-grain intakes were estimated by processing level, and regression models were used to explore associations across tertiles for total, non-UPF (Nova 1-3) and UPF (Nova 4) whole-grain intakes with cardiometabolic risk measures.
resultsAdults median total whole-grain intake was 34.3 g/10 MJ/d (Australia) and 11.6 g/10 MJ/d (US). Mean whole-grain intake from UPF sources was higher in the US (71.0%) compared to Australia (48.9%). In Australia and the US, respectively, tertiles of non-UPF whole-grain intake were inversely associated with body weight (p = 0.02; p = 0.002), BMI (p = 0.001; p < 0.0001), waist circumference (p = 0.02; p = 0.001), waist-to-height ratio (WHR) (p = 0.003; p = 0.0001), and C-reactive protein (CRP) (p = 0.02; p = 0.0003), and for fasting plasma glucose (p = 0.002) in Australia only. UPF whole-grain intake was inversely associated with WHR (p = 0.04; p = 0.03) and diastolic blood pressure (p = 0.01; p = 0.03), as well as waist circumference (p = 0.0496) in Australia, and BMI (p = 0.03) and CRP (p = 0.02) in the US. Non-UPF whole-grain sources had stronger inverse associations than UPF sources.
conclusionsAll whole grain foods should be promoted in public health and consumer messaging with emphasis on less processed sources given their greater observed benefit to cardiometabolic risk measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.