ArticlePloS one2026
Therapeutic communication in nursing students: A cross-sectional study of personal, educational, and contextual factors.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTherapeutic communication is a key competency in nursing education and a central component of person-centred care. However, evidence regarding its association with personal, educational, and contextual factors among nursing students remains heterogeneous.
objectiveTo describe therapeutic communication scores in nursing students and to examine their association with personal, educational, and contextual variables using the Therapeutic Communication Scale in Nursing Students.
methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted among second-, third-, and fourth-year undergraduate nursing students at a Spanish university. Participants completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and academic variables, self-perceived communication ability, factors related to stress and the clinical practice context, and the Therapeutic Communication Scale in Nursing Students, which provides a total score and two dimensions: Relation Building and Problem Solving. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and bivariate analyses were performed using non-parametric tests.
resultsA total of 450 students participated. Mean scores indicated a generally high level of therapeutic communication. Female students obtained significantly higher scores than male students in both dimensions and in the total scale score. No significant differences were observed according to academic shift, employment status, volunteering experience, or academic stress level. Higher self-perceived communication ability and greater motivation towards nursing studies were associated with higher therapeutic communication scores. In addition, students who reported frequent use of communicative behaviours such as active listening, verbal empathy, and open-ended questions showed significantly higher scores. Perceived support from clinical tutors and clinical accompaniment was not associated with communication scores, whereas a favourable clinical climate was associated with slightly higher total scores.
conclusionsTherapeutic communication in nursing students appears to be more strongly associated with self-perceived competence, academic motivation, and specific communicative behaviours than with sociodemographic characteristics or stress levels. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening training in concrete communication skills during undergraduate nursing education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.