Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41843668›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

A population threshold for dedicated teaching.

Hirotaka Goto, Joshua B Plotkin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hirotaka GotoMathematical Sciences Program, Graduate School of Advanced Mathematical Sciences, Meiji University, Nakano, Tokyo 164-8525, Japan.ORCID 0009-0004-7598-913X
Joshua B PlotkinDepartment of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104.ORCID 0000-0003-2349-6304

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teachers hold a prominent place in modern societies, particularly where education is compulsory and widely institutionalized. This ubiquity obscures an underlying puzzle: Why do societies assign some individuals solely to the instruction of others? This question is especially enigmatic for dedicated teachers, who invest their labor in cultivating others' skills but do not themselves participate in the productive activities for which their students are being trained. To address this question, we develop a simple, mathematically tractable model of teaching and learning in a population that shares a common productive aim. We identify a tradeoff between the size of the workforce and its collective level of expertise; and we analyze the optimal proportion of a population that should serve as teachers, across diverse scenarios. We find that a population must exceed a critical size before it is beneficial to allocate anyone as a dedicated teacher at all. Subsequently, the peak demand for teachers is achieved at an intermediate population size and never exceeds one half of the population. For more complicated tasks, our analysis predicts the optimal allocation of teachers to instruction across different levels of expertise. Although our model is not evolutionary per se, this population-level account lays a foundation for understanding the adaptive advantage of dedicated teachers in both human and nonhuman populations.

Indexed as

TeachingHumansLearningModels, TheoreticalPopulation Densityevolutionpopulation dynamicssize-complexity hypothesisspecializationteaching

Identifiers

PMID41843668
PMCPMC13012128

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.