Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41844648›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

An intralayer microcircuit in the temporal association cortex underlies sensory-induced escape in mice.

He Li, Jiajia Chen, Wen Zhong, Na Lian, Yumei Huang, Linhui Yao, Peiran Yin, Ziyi Xu, Xiaoxia Qin, Jie Tan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

He Li *Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4345-0161
Jiajia Chen *Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-2003-6652
Wen ZhongSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. zhong1981@smu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-0212-890X
Na LianDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yumei HuangDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Linhui YaoDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Peiran YinSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Ziyi XuDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Xiaoxia QinThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jie TanSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yingying ZengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong Basic Research Center of Excellence for Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine for Qingzhi Diseases, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Jinhua LiuThe Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Zhongju XiaoDepartment of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China. xiaozj@smu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6275-7250

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 32371044 and 32070994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A central goal in neuroscience is to clarify how neural circuits translate sensory input into adaptive behaviours. Although unisensory evoked escape circuits in mice are well defined, it remains unclear whether a single nucleus contains specialized sensory, sensory‒motor decision, and motor command neurons for escapes driven by distinct sensory cues, and how these neurons form functional microcircuits. Using multiple sensory stimuli in mice, we identified the temporal association cortex (TeA) as a critical escape hub. Combining in vivo electrophysiology, optogenetics and chemogenetics, we characterized three distinct neuron subtypes within TeA layer 5 (L5) CaMKII neurons that correspond to these three functional classes. Intratelencephalic (IT) neurons serve as sensory‒motor decision neurons, while layer matched pyramidal tract (PT) neurons projecting to the dorsal periaqueductal grey (dPAG) act as motor command neurons. We reveal a laminar IT-PT microcircuit that converts sensory input into sensory-motor decisions and commands for escape locomotion.

Indexed as

Escape ReactionAnimalsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2ChemogeneticsFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNeuronsOptogeneticsPeriaqueductal GrayPyramidal TractsCalcium-Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase Type 2

Identifiers

PMID41844648
PMCPMC13144386

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.