ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-dimensional deep learning-based segmentation and volumetric assessment of sphenoid sinus fluid on postmortem CT in drowning cases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sphenoid sinus fluid is considered a supportive indicator of drowning in forensic medicine, but traditional manual assessment on postmortem computed tomography (PMCT) is labor-intensive and observer-dependent. Efficient, reproducible methods for quantitative evaluation are needed in forensic practice. This study developed deep learning-based approaches for the automated segmentation and volumetric estimation of sphenoid sinus fluid using PMCT images from 165 autopsy-confirmed drowning cases. Three U-Net-based models (2D, 2.5D, and 3D) were developed and evaluated against manually annotated reference standards. In the test dataset, mean Dice coefficients were 0.866 (2D), 0.869 (2.5D), and 0.798 (3D). Volumetric estimates showed no statistically significant differences from the reference standard, with strong correlations (Spearman's ρ = 0.976-0.988). Mean absolute errors were 0.218 (2D), 0.206 (2.5D), and 0.310 ml (3D). The 2.5D approach provided the most balanced performance between segmentation accuracy and volumetric estimation. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of automated PMCT-based segmentation and volumetric quantification of sphenoid sinus fluid, enabling quantitative assessment on PMCT images prior to autopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.