ArticleScientific reports2026
Gene expression links consistent immune and inflammatory pathways to bovine respiratory disease in high-risk stocker cattle.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bovine respiratory disease (BRD) remains the leading cause of morbidity and economic loss in North American cattle production. Cattle at high risk of BRD are often managed through antimicrobial metaphylaxis, although there are growing concerns regarding the use of antimicrobial drugs in food animals. To better understand host immunological responses to BRD and the effects of metaphylaxis, this study evaluated whole-blood gene expression patterns in high-risk stocker heifers using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq). Eighty-four commercial heifers were randomly assigned to receive metaphylaxis with tulathromycin (META) or no metaphylaxis (NO META) upon arrival. Cattle were monitored over a 70-day period for clinical BRD, with whole blood collected from a subset of 60 heifers across multiple timepoints in both cattle that developed (TREAT) or failed to develop BRD (HEALTHY) for RNA-Seq. Principal component and differential gene expression analyses (FDR ≤ 0.05) were conducted to explore transcriptomic differences associated with BRD diagnosis over time, metaphylactic treatment, and disease severity. Minimal differences in the transcriptome were observed between META and NO META cattle at the time of BRD diagnosis, while comparisons between HEALTHY and TREAT cattle at onset of clinical disease revealed greater than 2000 differentially expressed genes (DEGs), with significant functional enrichment of immune-related pathways, including cytokine signaling, lymphocyte activation, and inflammatory responses. Notably, five genes (IL1R2, HP, S100A9, TLR4, and ALOX15) were consistently up- or downregulated in BRD cases, regardless of study group allocation. These observations align with previous studies, which support their candidacy as useful biomarkers for BRD detection. Despite the significant changes observed at the onset of clinical BRD, no differences were identified among these animals at the start of the study. This inability to predict future disease development or severity may have been affected by the low morbidity rate observed in this cohort. Expression of genes coding for heat shock proteins at subsequent treatments suggested that these may be useful markers of disease persistence or severity. These findings suggest that while metaphylaxis reduces BRD incidence, host transcriptomic profiles at disease onset offer improved insight into BRD pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.