ArticleScientific reports2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding transfusion-related acute lung injury among healthcare providers in Jiangsu: a multicenter cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This cross-sectional survey evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of healthcare providers regarding transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) in Jiangsu from March to May 2025. A self-administered questionnaire was distributed, with 746 valid responses analyzed. Respondents were predominantly female (76.5%), employed in tertiary hospitals (88.2%), and held a bachelor's degree or lower (81.6%), with nurses comprising 67.3% of participants. Only 34.5% had received formal TRALI-related training in the past three years. Knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 22.49 ± 2.38 (0-24), 43.62 ± 3.37 (10-50), and 50.27 ± 7.13 (11-55), respectively. Path analysis indicated that knowledge exerted a significant direct positive effect on attitude (β = 0.337, P = 0.009) and practice (β = 0.136, P = 0.011), with an indirect effect on practice mediated by attitude (β = 0.179, P = 0.008). Attitude had the strongest direct influence on practice (β = 0.532, P = 0.014). The findings suggest that healthcare providers demonstrated relatively high overall knowledge and practice scores; however, notable gaps remained, particularly in treatment-related knowledge and proactive practices, with attitudes notably mediating the translation of knowledge into practice. To strengthen TRALI prevention and management, targeted, regularly updated training and institution-wide protocols are recommended to reinforce awareness, optimize attitudes, and sustain best practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.