ArticleScientific reports2026
FAD-MIL: a weakly supervised fracture detection model based on X-ray images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fractures are among the most common presentations to emergency and orthopedic services, yet radiograph interpretation remains inconsistent, particularly in resource-limited and off-hours settings. Weakly supervised learning offers a scalable alternative to costly pixel-level annotation but often fails to capture subtle, focal fracture cues. We propose FAD-MIL (Fracture-Aware Dual-stream Multiple-Instance Learning), which addresses these limitations through three design choices: (1) a global-local dual-stream architecture that captures both whole-image context and fine-grained tile features, (2) a fracture-aware gating mechanism that re-weights instance representations toward fracture-discriminative patterns, and (3) Top-K instance selection that focuses learning on the most informative regions. On FracAtlas (4,068 radiographs), FAD-MIL achieves an AUC of 0.833 (95% CI 0.797-0.871), average precision of 0.619, and F1 of 0.541, outperforming Mean-Pool MIL and Tile-Vote MIL and performing comparably to ABMIL while offering more interpretable instance-level attribution. Transferability was assessed on a retrospective single-center positive-only cohort (distal radius, n = 975; ankle, n = 350); because contemporaneous non-fracture controls were unavailable, recall across decision thresholds is reported as a preliminary sensitivity analysis. Gradient-based feature-attribution heatmaps provide a qualitative visualization of regions associated with fracture predictions. Future validation with matched non-fracture controls is required to further evaluate specificity and false-positive rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.