ReviewWorld journal of pediatrics : WJP2026
Modeling Williams syndrome from a neurodevelopmental perspective: recent advances, model-based translational insights and future directions.
Review in World journal of pediatrics : WJP, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWilliams syndrome (WS; OMIM #194,050) is a multisystem pediatric genetic disorder caused by a heterozygous microdeletion of a 1.5-1.8 Mb region at chromosome 7q11.23, encompassing 26 to 28 genes. Clinical hallmarks include cardiovascular anomalies, distinctive craniofacial morphology and neurodevelopmental deficits characterized by hypersociability, cognitive impairment and anxiety. Although causative therapies for WS still remain elusive, advances in gene editing and forebrain organoids have already greatly furthered our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. DATA SOURCES: This narrative review was conducted by searching for papers using PubMed/MEDLINE. Relevant publications were identified using single and/or combined keywords including: Williams syndrome, 7q11.23, microdeletion, microduplication, atypical deletion, neurodevelopment, neuroanatomy, neuroimaging. cognitive impairment, mouse models, GTF2I, GTF2IRD1, CLIP2, LIMK1, NCF1, EIF4H, STX1A/B, FZD9, HIP1, CLDN3, FKBP6, organoid, induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) and forebrain organoids.
resultsMouse models including multigene deletion strains recapitulating the WS critical region and single-gene knockout strains targeting Gtf2i, Gtf2ird1, Clip2 and Limk1 replicate key WS neurodevelopmental phenotypes, substantially contributing to mechanistic studies and therapeutic screening. In addition, forebrain organoids derived from patients or generated by gene editing have provided human-specific insights into progenitor dynamics, synaptic function, and ribosome biogenesis.
conclusionsThis review synthesizes recent progress in WS modeling in the context of neurodevelopmental impairments. While animal models and forebrain organoids have substantially accelerated both mechanistic understanding and translational research in WS, effective diagnostic and therapeutic approaches are still unavailable. Integration of animal models and forebrain organoids, together with the advanced technologies, will be essential for biomarker discovery and development of mechanism-based therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.