ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2026
Intubation exposure associated with first-pass success - understanding practitioner-related characteristics in South African EMS.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndotracheal intubation is a critical life-saving intervention in prehospital emergency care, yet evidence supporting its safe implementation by prehospital practitioners in lower- to middle-income countries remains limited. First pass success (FPS) rates serve as a key process quality indicator, potentially influenced by practitioner-specific factors including clinical experience and procedure exposure. Differentiation between these two distinct measures is critical in understanding their impact on FPS.
objectiveTo describe the association between practitioner experience and intubation procedure exposure, and first-pass success rates during prehospital endotracheal intubation.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of all prehospital intubations performed by practitioners of a public Emergency Medical Service in South Africa between January 2022 and December 2023. Data were extracted from the EMS case registry, which included integrated Computer Aided Dispatch and electronic Patient Care Record systems. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess associations, with mixed-model logistic regression identifying practitioner variability.
resultsAmong 530,371 primary case activations, a total of 236 intubations were performed by 40 prehospital practitioners during the study period. The overall FPS rate was 80.9% (95% CI: 75.9–86.0%). Practitioner experience ranged from 0 to 14 years (mean 5.7 ± 3.5 years), with procedure exposure ranging from one to 55 intubations (mean 5.9 ± 11.2 intubations). Procedure exposure showed a statistically significant positive association with FPS (OR = 1.020, 95% CI: 1.000–1.040, p < 0.05). However, clinical experience showed no statistically significant association with FPS (OR = 0.940, 95% CI: 0.850–1.030, p = 0.190), while practitioners with zero to three years of experience demonstrated one of the highest FPS rates (83.33%).
conclusionThis study reveals a significant association between intubation procedure exposure and first-pass success rates in prehospital intubations, while practitioner experience demonstrated a non-significant association. These findings highlight the importance of continuous professional development in South African prehospital airway management and reinforce the imperative for sustained commitment to clinical excellence as a driver of system growth and improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.