SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2026
Potential use of ivabradine in postoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative junctional ectopic tachycardia (JET) is a frequent, hemodynamically consequential arrhythmia after congenital heart surgery. Ivabradine is increasingly used off-label, but its effectiveness and safety in pediatric postoperative JET remain uncertain.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review and single‑arm meta‑analysis of studies enrolling children (< 18 years) with postoperative JET treated with oral or nasogastric ivabradine. Outcomes included conversion to sinus rhythm, time to conversion, recurrence, use of concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), adverse events (AEs) (bradycardia, hypotension, QT prolongation, atrioventricular block), and all‑cause mortality. Study‑level event rates were pooled as proportions using random‑effects models.
resultsFive studies (1 randomized trial arm, 3 cohorts, 1 case series; N = 87) met the inclusion criteria. Ivabradine dosing ranged from 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg every 12 h. Across ivabradine‑based regimens, the pooled conversion proportion was 98.8% (95% CI 93.8–100), with reported mean times to stable sinus rhythm between 7.1 and 55.5 h. The pooled JET recurrence proportion was 3% (95% CI 0–12.1). Concomitant intravenous or oral AADs were used in 48.3% of patients (95% CI 10.4–87.2). No ivabradine-attributed bradycardia, hypotension, QT-interval prolongation, or new/worsening atrioventricular block was reported; all‑cause mortality was 2.1% (95% CI 0–10.1), attributed in the primary reports to postoperative complications rather than directly to ivabradine. In a sensitivity analysis restricted to two studies with ≤ 25% concomitant antiarrhythmic drug use, the conversion proportion remained high (98%), but confidence intervals for recurrence and mortality were wide.
conclusionsIn the small, predominantly observational studies available, ivabradine-based regimens were associated with high conversion to sinus rhythm and low short-term recurrence of postoperative JET, with no hemodynamic or conduction AEs reported among 87 patients. Interpretation is limited by nonrandomized designs, frequent cotreatment with other AADs, short follow‑up, and regional concentration of data; the pooled proportions should be viewed as exploratory summaries rather than estimates of ivabradine’s independent effect. Multicentre randomized trials are needed to define causal efficacy, optimal dosing, and longer‑term safety.
trial registrationThis systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251080412).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.