Evidence mapPaperPMID 41845360Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2026

"We never leave anyone behind": a qualitative study of stakeholders' perspectives on disability-inclusive maternity care in Cambodia.

Champamunny Ven, Manjula Marella, Cathy Vaughan, Alexandra Devine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Champamunny VenNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Unit 2/32 Lincoln Square N, Carlton VIC, Melbourne, 3053, Australia. champamunny.ven@student.unimelb.edu.au.
Manjula MarellaNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Unit 2/32 Lincoln Square N, Carlton VIC, Melbourne, 3053, Australia.
Cathy VaughanNossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Unit 2/32 Lincoln Square N, Carlton VIC, Melbourne, 3053, Australia.
Alexandra DevineCentre for Health Policy, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite some progress towards disability rights in Cambodia, women with disabilities still experience inequitable access to maternity care. To provide a context-specific understanding of this complex issue, we conducted a study exploring the perspectives of key stakeholders from across the health and disability sectors regarding disability-inclusive maternity care in three locations of Cambodia: Phnom Penh, Kampong Speu, and Kampot.

methodsThis study employed a qualitative descriptive approach, using semi-structured interviews with twelve government and non-governmental stakeholders. Data were transcribed verbatim, translated from Khmer to English, anonymised, and thematically analysed using the WHO Quality of Care framework.

resultsAlongside presenting findings relevant to (1) Perceptions and conceptualisation of disability-inclusive maternity care, results were thematically presented across the relevant WHO Quality of Care framework components, including (2) Competent and motivated human resources; (3) Essential physical resources; (4) Provision of care; (5) Experience of care. All stakeholders unanimously agreed that maternity care services for women with disabilities were not inclusive, including the absence of disability-inclusive maternity care policies, guidelines and training for the healthcare workforce. Barriers to access were exacerbated when health services lacked sufficient human resources, equipment and referral systems to accommodate the needs of this population. Government stakeholders conceptualised disability-inclusive care as equal treatment without discrimination. Some commended existing social protection funding and considered it adequate to support access to maternity care. In contrast, non-governmental stakeholders emphasised that equitable maternity care requires both accessible infrastructure and services and more effective implementation of social protection measures.

conclusionThis study provided the context of the disability-inclusive maternity care in Cambodia from the perspectives of key stakeholders. The study highlighted that the Cambodian health system was inadequately responding to the maternity care needs of women with disabilities. A collaborative approach among government staff and relevant stakeholders is needed to develop a disability-inclusive maternity care policy and ensure effective implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. Additionally, capacity building for healthcare providers with disability inclusion is essential to ensure that women with disabilities are not left behind when they access maternity care.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMaternal Health ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesStakeholder ParticipationAdultCambodiaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareCambodiaDisability-inclusive maternity careHealthcare policiesHealth services accessibilityMaternal health servicesPersons with disabilitiesStakeholder participation

Identifiers

PMID41845360
PMCPMC13107739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.