ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026
Supervised machine learning model to predict total knee replacement in a large osteoartrhitis real-world evidence dataset using retrospectively 20-year insurance data from Israel.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOsteoarthritis (OA) affects over 500 million patients worldwide, significantly impacting their quality of life and independence. The incidence of OA is expected to rise due to aging populations and increasing obesity rates. Traditionally considered a degenerative, age-related disease, OA is now recognized as heterogeneous with different phenotypes. This study aimed to evaluate the use of real-world evidence (RWE) data for phenotyping OA and developing a predictive model for total knee replacement (TKR) using insurance data from Israel.
methodsThe study utilized anonymized electronic health record data from Maccabi Healthcare Services, covering over 26% of the Israeli population. Patients diagnosed with knee OA 2000–2023, were included. Data on medical history, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle factors were extracted from the database. The outcome was the time to the first TKR, analyzed using a regularized Lasso Cox regression model. The model’s performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and C-index metrics.
resultsA total of 135,691 patients met the inclusion criteria. The population was divided into a training (80%) and test set (20%) for model development and performance assessment. Baseline data were comparable between the training and test sets. In total, 3230 (2.4%) TKR events were observed with an estimated rate of 2% (95% CI: 1.9–2.1) at 2 years. Out of 62 initial variables the most predictive ones for TKR were age, presence of allergy and BMI. The final model categorized patients into low- (75%) and high-risk (25%) groups based on a predicted risk score with 4% (95%CI: 3.8–4.2) of TKR events by 2 years in high-risk vs. 1.4% (95%CI: 1.2–1.6) in the low-risk group.
conclusionThe study demonstrated the feasibility of using RWE data for risk phenotyping in OA and predicting TKR. More granular phenotyping reflecting OA heterogeneity proved impossible. The predictive model, however, based on data typically available in clinical practice, could support shared decision-making, simplify feasibility assessments and enrichment strategies for research for large trials. The use of RWE data may better reflect the epidemiologic reality and reduce biases associated with clinical trials and registries that otherwise form the basis of trial planning. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.