Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845429›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2026

Evolve with your research: stepwise system evolution from document-driven to fact-centric research data management in materials science.

Victor Dudarev, Alfred Ludwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Victor DudarevMaterials Discovery and Interfaces, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany. victor.dudarev@rub.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7243-9096
Alfred LudwigMaterials Discovery and Interfaces, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801, Bochum, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2802-6774

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 388390466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The digitalisation of research requires data management systems capable of supporting a broad spectrum of usage scenarios, ranging from document-oriented repositories to fully factographic environments. This paper introduces a methodological approach for the stepwise development of such systems, illustrated by the MatInf Research Data Management System (RDMS). The proposed framework combines a graph-based STAR paradigm-emphasising Statefulness, Traceability, Aim, and Result-with the SET methodology, which enables systematic Standardisation, Extraction, and Testing of research data. Together, these principles provide a pathway towards FAIR-compliant data infrastructures, facilitating reproducibility, re-use, and integration of heterogeneous materials science data. By demonstrating the gradual consolidation of research outputs into unified datasets, this study highlights how adaptive RDMS design can support accelerated scientific discovery and enhance collaborative research in large-scale projects.Scientific Contribution: This work develops a methodological framework for the progressive evolution of research data management systems in materials science, moving from document-oriented to graph-based and ultimately factographic approaches.

Indexed as

Document-based repositoriesFactographic systemsGraph data modelsMultimodal databasesResearch Data Management System (RDMS)STAR–SET methodology

Identifiers

PMID41845429
PMCPMC13063433

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.