Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845443›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Treatment guided by cerebral oximetry in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation: study protocol for step one of the SafeBoosC-IIIv randomised clinical trial.

Caroline Barkholt Kamp, Johanne Juul Petersen, Mathias Lühr Hansen, Adelina Pellicer, Gunnar Naulaers, Eugene Dempsey, Gitte Holst Hahn, Markus Harboe Olsen, Marie Isabel Skov Rasmussen, Gerhard Pichler and 31 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05907317 (Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children-IIIv), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05907317 phase3recruitingnot on this map

Safeguarding the Brain of Our Smallest Children-IIIv (SafeBoosC-IIIv): Cerebral Oximetry Versus Usual Care in Mechanically Ventilated Newborns

TypeinterventionalSponsorCopenhagen Trial Unit, Center for Clinical Intervention ResearchRan2025 to 2029Enrolled1,610ConditionsHypoxia, Infant, Newborn, DiseasesArmsCerebral oximetry monitoring device, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Caroline Barkholt KampCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark. caroline.kamp@ctu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7756-4694
Johanne Juul PetersenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mathias Lühr HansenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Adelina PellicerDepartment of Neonatology, La Paz University Hospital, Hospital La Paz Institute for Health Research-IdIPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
Gunnar NaulaersUniversity Hospital Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Eugene DempseyInfant Research Centre, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Gitte Holst HahnDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Markus Harboe OlsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marie Isabel Skov RasmussenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Gerhard PichlerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Gabriel DimitriouDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Tomasz SzczapaII Department of Neonatology, Neonatal Biophysical Monitoring and Cardiopulmonary Therapies Research Unit, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Maria Livia OgneanFaculty of Medicine, Lucian Blaga University Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania.
Saudamini NesargiJohn's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gabriel MusanteHospital Universitario Austral, Pilar, Argentina.
Lina ChalakUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Massimo Di MaioCHU Nîmes, Nimes, France.
Jyoti LakhwaniWomen and Newborn Hospital, University Teaching Hospitals, Lusaka, Zambia.
Renato S ProcianoyHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal Do Rio Grande Do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Jakub TkaczykUniversity Hospital Motol, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hans FuchsMedical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Merih CetinkayaDepartment of Neonatology, Health Sciences University, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Cornelia HagmannDepartment of Neonatology and Intensive Care, University Children's Hospital Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Himanshu PopatGrace Centre for Newborn Intensive Care in The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, Australia.
Jorge FabresDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Laishuan WangNational Health Commission Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Georg SchmölzerDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Monica FumagalliFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Salvador Piris-BorregasHospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Ramona MohoraThe National Institute for Mother and Child Care Alessandrescu-Rusescu, Polizu Maternity, Bucharest, Romania.
Pamela ZafraHospital Universitario Puerta del Mar, Cadiz, Spain.
Kosmas Sarafidis1st Department of Neonatology and Intensive Care Unit of Aristotle University, Ippokrateion General Hospital of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Miguel Alsina-CasanovaDepartment of Neonatology, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, BCNatal-Barcelona Center for Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Barcelona, Spain.
Nariae Baik-SchneditzDivision of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescence Medicine, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria.
Laura Serrano LopezHospital Universitario Virgen Las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Elke GriesmaierDepartment of Pediatrics II, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Eleftheria HatzidakiDepartment of Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece.
Shashidhar AJohn's Medical College Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Theodore DassiosDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Patras, Patras, Greece.
Gorm GreisenDepartment of Neonatology, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janus Christian JakobsenCopenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, The Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of invasive mechanical ventilation in newborns has several risks, including ventilator-induced lung injury, ventilation-associated pneumonia, and hyperventilation leading to potential brain injury, prolonged hospitalisations, and increased mortality. The SafeBoosC-IIIv trial aims to assess the benefits and harms of treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 28 days from birth. The SafeBoosC consortium is a global network of neonatologists from multiple neonatal intensive care units worldwide.

methodsThe SafeBoosC-IIIv trial is an investigator-initiated, multinational, randomised, pragmatic, superiority phase III clinical trial. The trial will be conducted in two steps. This is a protocol for step one. The objective of step one is to assess if treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring according to the SafeBoosC treatment guideline compared with usual care in newborns receiving invasive mechanical ventilation increases the number of hospital-free days. The participants will be newborns with a gestational age more than or equal to 28 + 0 weeks, postnatal age less than 28 days, expected to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (intubation) for at least 24 h, and a cerebral oximeter available so monitoring can be started within 6 h after initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Exclusion criteria will be suspicion of or confirmed brain injury or congenital heart malformation likely to require surgery. A total of 1,610 participants will be randomised 1:1 to treatment guided by cerebral oximetry monitoring or usual care. The primary outcome will be hospital-free days, and the secondary outcomes will be serious adverse events and invasive mechanical ventilation-free days. All outcomes will be assessed at 90 days after randomisation. DISCUSSION: The SafeBoosC-IIIv trial has several strengths, including detailed predefined methodology, a high degree of external validity due to centres in several countries, and the trial will be built upon the already established SafeBoosC consortium and the experience from the previous SafeBoosC-II and SafeBoosC-III trials. The SafeBoosC-IIIv trial has limitations, including current lack of funding for step two, lack of blinding of the clinical staff, and the clinicians may have limited experience in using the device.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05907317, registered 8 June 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05907317?cond=NCT05907317&rank=1.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationOximetryRespiration, ArtificialClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMulticenter Studies as TopicPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicPredictive Value of TestsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCerebral oximetry monitoringMechanical ventilationNeonatologyProtocolRandomised clinical trial

Identifiers

PMID41845443
PMCPMC13107782

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.