ArticleJournal of translational medicine2026
MetaScreener: a robust dual-mode framework for directional prioritization of actionable signatures through multi-dataset and multi-approach integration.
Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Reliably quantifying the directionality of signatures from noisy omics data remains challenging, hindering their widespread applications in biomedical research and drug development. To address this, we developed MetaScreener, a dual-mode framework (DiffMetaScreener and CorMetaScreener) that integrated multiple datasets and a large number of analysis pipelines (>4, 000) for robust quantification of activating and inhibiting signals in gene signatures. Supervised application of MetaScreener on 9 colorectal cancer (CRC) training datasets prioritized positive and negative Wnt signaling signatures, respectively. Robustness benchmarking against random perturbations, including extreme noises, revealed that MetaScreener outperformed conventional approaches. Independent validation on 22 CRC datasets and a massive-scale single-cell dataset further confirmed the accuracy of the prioritized signatures. In the case study, parthenolide was discovered and experimentally validated as a dual inhibitor targeting both Wnt signaling and CRC metastasis. Collectively, MetaScreener demonstrates as a reliable and powerful tool for directional prioritization of both functional and actionable gene signatures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.