ArticleMicrobiome2026
Limosilactobacillus reuteri enhances production performance and ovarian function via modulation of the gut-ovary axis in laying hens.
Article in Microbiome, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decoding the gut-adipose-ovary axis in polycystic ovary syndrome: from metabolic dysregulation to oncological risk modulation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDeclines in nutrient absorption and reproductive function following peak laying significantly compromise egg production and quality in hens. Bacterial and enzymatic co-fermented feed is a promising intervention to improve gut health and production metrics. However, its mechanism of action remains unclear.
resultsBacterial and enzymatic co-fermented feed supplementation in laying hens significantly enhanced egg production, egg weight, and feed intake while reducing the feed conversion ratio. Egg quality improved markedly, denoted by an increase in albumen height, the Haugh unit, and eggshell strength and thickness. The apparent digestibility of calcium in laying hens increased. Although the tibial growth indices remained unchanged, bone microarchitecture improved, evidenced by increased trabecular mineralisation and a reduction in the number of osteoclasts. Intestinal integrity was strengthened based on an elevated villus/crypt ratio, upregulation of barrier genes (ZO-1, Claudin-1, Occludin), increased IL-10 expression, and decreased IL-6 and TNF-α expression. Bacterial and enzymatic co-fermented feed reshaped the caecal microbiota, enriching Limosilactobacillus. This genus was also enriched in the oviduct and ovary. SourceTracker analysis revealed a caecum-oviduct-ovary microbial transmission route. In the ovary, bacterial and enzymatic co-fermented feed enhanced the expression of FSHR, AMH, and antioxidant genes (Nrf2, SOD1, CAT, GPX3, and HO-1); upregulated Bcl-2; and downregulated Caspase-3 and Caspase-8, supporting improved follicular health and antioxidant defences.
conclusionsThis study is the first to clarify the regulatory mechanism of bacterial and enzymatic co-fermented feed on laying performance of laying hens from a microbial perspective. The co-fermented feed improved the laying performance, egg quality and tibial microarchitecture of laying hens by optimizing the microbial composition of the cecum, oviduct and ovary, thus delaying ovarian aging and enhancing ovarian function. Furthermore, we found the ovarian microbial composition of laying hens was affected by the oviduct microbiota, which was in turn influenced by the intestinal and cloacal microbiota, providing experimental evidence for the gut-oviduct-ovary axis in laying hens and a new perspective for exploring the correlation between feed nutrition and reproductive performance of laying hens. Video abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.