ArticleParasites & vectors2026
Detection of supergroup B Wolbachia strains and their co-infection with Plasmodium falciparum in wild Anopheles funestus in southeastern Tanzania: implications for malaria control.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence of natural infection with Wolbachia and its negative correlation with Plasmodium falciparum among wild malaria vectors has opened new avenues for utilization of Wolbachia in malaria vector control. However, the interaction between Wolbachia and Plasmodium parasites in mosquitoes tends to be species-specific and may show ecological variations. Among the primary malaria vectors in Tanzania, natural Wolbachia infection has only been observed in Anopheles arabiensis, while there is still limited information on Wolbachia natural infection in Anopheles funestus sensu lato, and its interaction with P. falciparum in the mosquito species. Therefore, this study investigated the prevalence of natural infection and co-infection of Wolbachia and P. falciparum in the An. funestus s.l. in southeastern Tanzania, and characterized the Wolbachia strains detected.
methodsThe study was conducted in five villages in southeastern Tanzania between March and June 2024. Mosquitoes were collected from 52 households using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) light traps and Prokopack aspirators, followed by morphological identification. Detection of An. funestus sibling species and Wolbachia was performed using conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR (Wolbachia only). Sanger sequencing was performed as a confirmatory test followed by phylogenetic analysis of the detected Wolbachia strains. P. falciparum sporozoites were detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
resultsWolbachia was detected in almost half of all wild An. funestus s.l. tested using the primary PCR (prevalence = 46.5%, N = 400); and more than half when nested PCR approach was used (prevalence = 70.8%, N = 400). Only three mosquitoes carried P. falciparum sporozoites (prevalence = 0.8%, N = 400) and only one showed co-infection with Wolbachia (prevalence = 0.3%, n = 400). Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis involving both the 16S rDNA, coxA, and wsp Wolbachia genes showed that the detected strains clustered with Wolbachia supergroup B, specific for Dipterans.
conclusionsUnlike findings from the previous study, this study demonstrates that An. funestus s.l. in southeastern Tanzania are infected with Wolbachia, at a surprisingly high prevalence. This study also provides the first report on Wolbachia-P. falciparum co-infection status in An. funestus s.l. in Tanzania. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the association between native Wolbachia and P. falciparum in wild An. funestus s.l. in southeastern Tanzania.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.