Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845531›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2026

Using reciprocally retained gene families to detect whole-genome multiplications in plants.

Setareh Tasdighian, Cecilia Sensalari, Steven Maere

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Setareh Tasdighian *Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Cecilia Sensalari *Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium.
Steven MaereDepartment of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, 9052, Belgium. steven.maere@psb.vib-ugent.be.

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek G.0088.12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraces of ancient whole-genome multiplications (WGMs) have been observed all over the plant kingdom and have been associated with various evolutionary processes, such as increased evolvability, speciation, adaptation to changing environments, domestication and the origin of evolutionary novelties. However, understanding the impact of WGMs on plant evolution requires accurate detection of WGM events, which is challenging because of rapid signal erosion due to genome rearrangements, sequence divergence and the occurrence of additional large- and small-scale duplications.

resultsHere, we investigate whether reciprocally retained gene families, i.e. gene families that preferentially expand through WGM and rarely exhibit small-scale duplications, can be used as WGM markers in angiosperms. Using stochastic birth-death modeling of gene families' gene count profiles across species to test for WGM presence or absence, we demonstrate that strongly reciprocally retained gene families have higher power to detect true WGMs and to reject false WGMs than non-reciprocally retained gene families.

conclusionsAlthough none of the reciprocally retained gene families is a perfect WGM marker on its own, we show that using an extended set of such families as input for birth-death and

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenes, PlantGenome, PlantMultigene FamilyEvolution, MolecularMagnoliopsida

Identifiers

PMID41845531
PMCPMC13141510

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.