Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41845565›Full record

ArticleThe Veterinary record2026

Pet-directed speech strengthens the veterinarian-client-patient relationship: Results from a pet owner survey.

Michael P McDermott, Louise Corah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Veterinary record, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael P McDermottCirca Healthcare, Chesterbrook, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9907-3194
Louise CorahSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0274-5650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies have documented veterinarians' use of pet-directed speech (PDS). The aims of this study were to assess the use of PDS during clinic visits and the impact of PDS on pet owners' opinions about their veterinarians.

methodsAn online survey of pet owners' experience with, and attitudes to, PDS was conducted using snowball sampling. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed on quantitative data, and a thematic analysis was performed on free-text responses.

resultsOf the 400 respondents, almost 80% reported veterinarians using PDS. Most characterised the use of PDS as very or extremely important, and nearly 90% would more likely choose to see again a veterinarian who employed PDS. Four themes were identified from the free-text analysis: 'pet at the centre', 'not just words', 'include the owner' and 'impressions of the veterinarian'. LIMITATIONS: The limitations of the study include the potential for bias and lack of randomisation with snowball sampling, and the relatively small study sample.

conclusionPDS is widely employed by veterinarians during veterinary consultations and is valued by pet owners. Further research could help confirm the impact of PDS on the veterinarian‒client‒patient relationship and its potential for integration in veterinary communication training.

Indexed as

Human-Animal BondPetsProfessional-Patient RelationsSpeechVeterinariansAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesVeterinary Medicine

Identifiers

PMID41845565
PMCPMC13377901

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.