Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41846316›Full record

ArticleHGG advances2026

Bayesian Mendelian randomization methods for index trait bias correction in subsequent trait genome-wide association studies.

Nimish Adhikari, Kathryn L Lunetta, David R Gagnon, Gina M Peloso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in HGG advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nimish AdhikariDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Kathryn L LunettaDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
David R GagnonDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Gina M PelosoDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA. Electronic address: gpeloso@bu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Index trait bias (also called index event bias) can occur in genetic studies due to conditioning on incident trait, which can bias genetic associations with subsequent traits. We propose the use of two Bayesian Mendelian randomization (MR) methods (Bayesian weighted MR [BWMR] and MR-HORSE) to correct index trait bias in genome-wide association studies (GWASs) of subsequent traits. We compare these Bayesian MR methods to previously proposed methods for index trait bias through a simulation study. We observe that BWMR has similar type I error compared to using an inverse variance weighted MR, weighted median MR, and Dudbridge but has an inflated type I error compared to SlopeHunter. MR-HORSE and SlopeHunter have similar type I errors for smaller correlations between incident and subsequent traits; however, MR-HORSE and SlopeHunter have better controlled type I error for a large negative correlation and large positive correlation, respectively. All methods have comparable power across correlations between incident and subsequent traits. We applied the methods to a GWAS of subsequent acute ischemic stroke (AIS) or 3-point major adverse cardiovascular event after an incident AIS event in the Million Veteran Program and for fasting insulin adjusted for body mass index, and we observed slight differences in the results between the correction methods. We observed that a single index trait bias correction method is not optimal across all scenarios; therefore, applying multiple methods and checking for consistency between the estimates could provide an approach to determine the presence of and correction for index trait bias.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyMendelian Randomization AnalysisBayes TheoremBiasComputer SimulationHumansBayesian Mendelian randomizationindex event biasindex trait biassubsequent trait

Identifiers

PMID41846316
PMCPMC13084361

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.