ArticleHGG advances2026
Breaking barriers to completing genetic testing for inherited breast cancer among at-risk Black women using a community-based participatory research approach.
Article in HGG advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
National guidelines from the US Preventive Services Task Force and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommend the use of family-health-history (FHH)-based risk assessment tools to guide genetic testing (GT) among women with an increased risk of inherited cancer and inform personalized cancer risk management. Prior research has focused on attitudes toward and decisions about initial uptake of GT in Black patients but little is known about the factors that impact the subsequent completion of GT after they have already provided consent. Using a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, we aimed to identify barriers and actionable strategies to improve GT completion offered through the Breast Health Assessment (BHA), an FHH screening tool administered at routine mammography visits. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 Black women who screened high-risk for inherited breast cancer and consented to GT through the BHA, but did not complete saliva sample collection. Thematic analysis revealed that lack of dedicated support throughout the BHA workflow emerged as a key obstacle to sample collection, whereas medical mistrust, shame, and limited knowledge were largely regarded as cultural barriers that had no impact on GT completion. Low utilization among participants reflected logistical challenges highlighting the need to evaluate multi-level implementation processes to better understand and address inequities in GT completion. Participants suggested implementing early educational outreach, culturally relevant messaging, and interpersonal touchpoints to promote GT uptake. By applying a CBPR approach, we translated these findings into actionable, equity-focused strategies to improve GT completion within a population genetic screening program.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.