Evidence mapPaperPMID 41846639Full record

ArticleCureus2026

The Impact of BMI on Perioperative Urine Volume and Renal Function in Living Donor Kidney Transplantation.

Masahiro Todaka, Tadasuke Ando, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Shinro Hata, Toru Inoue, Toshitaka Shin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masahiro TodakaUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Tadasuke AndoOrgan Transplantation Promotion Project, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Hiroyuki FujinamiUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Naoyuki YamanakaUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Shinro HataUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Toru InoueUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.
Toshitaka ShinUrology, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, JPN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity is a well-recognized risk factor for various systemic disorders and has also been shown to influence perioperative outcomes in surgical fields. In the context of living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT), increased BMI has been associated with greater technical complexity and a higher incidence of postoperative complications, including wound infection and delayed graft function (DGF). We explored the impact of BMI on the perioperative urine volume (UV) and renal function in LDKT.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis at a single institution to assess the impact of BMI on outcomes following LDKT. Patients were stratified according to BMI into the obese group (Og) (BMI ≥ 25 kg/m²) and the non-obese group (nOg) (BMI < 25 kg/m²). Between April 2010 and December 2024, 118 patients underwent LDKT at Oita University Hospital. After excluding patients who experienced acute rejection, underwent repeat kidney transplantation, or developed vesicoureteral anastomotic complications, 109 patients remained eligible for analysis. We compared outcomes and UV within 14 days postoperatively, and renal function between the Og and nOg. The mean (SD) postoperative follow-up period was 79.7(47.2) months in the nOg and 56.1 months (47.5) in the Og (p = 0.0156).

resultsA total of 109 patients were analyzed, comprising 36 patients in the Og and 73 in the nOg. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were generally comparable between the two groups, including age, sex, comorbidity, donor BMI, duration from dialysis initiation to transplantation, immunosuppressive regimens. However, baseline serum creatinine levels were significantly higher in obese recipients than in non-obese recipients (p = 0.005). Postoperatively, UV on postoperative day 1 (POD 1) was significantly lower in the Og (p = 0.02). Furthermore, the mean rate of creatinine reduction and the mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increase were significantly higher in the nOg from POD1 to POD4 (p<0.05). No significant differences were observed with respect to warm ischemia time (WIT), total ischemia time (TIT), length of hospital stay, or the incidence of postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis identified obesity as an independent predictor of reduced UV on POD1 (p = 0.00978).

conclusionObese recipients undergoing LDKT demonstrated significantly lower UV on POD1 and a slower initial recovery of graft function. However, these early physiological differences did not translate into a higher incidence of major postoperative complications or prolonged length of hospital stay. These findings suggest that although early UV may be lower in obese recipients, careful and individualized perioperative fluid management is essential to maintain adequate graft perfusion.

Indexed as

body mass indexliving donor kidney transplantationobesityrenal functionurine volume

Identifiers

PMID41846639
PMCPMC12990149

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.