ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Personalizing ecological momentary intervention for substance use disorders through data-driven decision rules.
Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substance use disorders (SUDs) are highly prevalent and lethal, yet treatment reach remains below 20%. As risk of substance use and relapse is episodic and context-dependent, ecological momentary interventions (EMIs) that deliver real-time intervention in daily life are promising, but findings to date remain mixed. We argue this variability reflects the importance of decision rules, when to deliver which intervention. However, current EMI systems mostly rely on static, one-size-fits-all rules that could not account for between-person differences and within-person fluctuations. We suggest a data-driven approach for building EMI systems, aiming to better address the heterogeneity of SUDs. First, collect multimodal, multicontextual data-spanning controlled laboratory tasks, everyday smartphone and wearable signals, and periods when devices are offline-to complement blind spots of individual data sources. Next, build context-aware prediction models that estimate momentary risk and validate predictors across contexts and modalities, enabling features discovered in one setting to be translated into signals available in another. Finally, implement real-time, context-sensitive decision rules that best fit the contextual profile of the risk. By centering EMIs on explicit, testable decision rules, this approach will offer a practical path to reducing variability in outcomes and deliver more reliable, personalized support at the moments and places where risk emerges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.