Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848019›Full record

ReviewJournal of fish biology2026

Bony fish genomes: Status and gaps.

Noelia Pérez-Pereira, Carmen Bouza, Paulino Martínez, Diego Robledo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Noelia Pérez-PereiraDepartamento de Zoología, Genética y Antropología Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4731-3712
Carmen BouzaDepartamento de Zoología, Genética y Antropología Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-4506
Paulino MartínezDepartamento de Zoología, Genética y Antropología Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8438-9305
Diego RobledoDepartamento de Zoología, Genética y Antropología Física, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9616-5912

Funding

BBSRC Institute Strategic Grants to the Roslin Institut BBS/E/RL/230001ABBSRC Institute Strategic Grants to the Roslin Institut BBS/E/RL/230002AEuropean Union ERC Starting Grant programme 2022 101076432Funding for open access charge: Universidade de Santiago de Compostela/CISUGGalicia Marine Science programme, which is part of Complementary Science Plans for Marine Science of Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades included in the Recovery, Transformation and Resilience Plan (PRTR-C17.I1) co-funded by Xunta de Galicia Next Generation EU and the European Maritime Fisheries and Aquaculture FundsOportunius programme of the Axencia Galega the Innovación (GAIN, Xunta de Galicia)Regional Government Xunta de Galicia (Spain) program ED431C 2022/33
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bony fish constitute an exceptionally species-rich group of aquatic vertebrates, comprising more than 95% of all living fish. The adaptive processes on the diversity of environments they inhabit make them a highly diverse group from taxonomic, morphological and evolutionary standpoints. Furthermore, among their members we find species of high economic value for global aquaculture and fisheries. This has attracted the attention of multiple research fields, from ecology or evolutionary biology to comparative genomics. However, deep biological or evolutionary studies require suitable genomic resources, particularly high-quality reference genomes, across multiple species and taxonomic groups. Here, we revise the current status of open access bony fish genome assemblies, with special emphasis on existing gaps throughout their phylogeny. Recently, there has been a boom of information and up to 1744 genomes are available, largely released in the last 5 years. They are distributed across 67 of the 72 recognized orders, where Cichliformes, Perciformes, Siluriformes, Cypriniformes and Cyprinodontiformes appear overrepresented, and across 268 families out of the 514 recognized. Overall, these figures cover around 5% of all described bony fish species. Despite five orders and 14 order-level incertae sedis families (mostly percomorphs) lacking genomic representation, high-throughput sequencing data for most gaps are available in the Sequence Read Archive repository of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Future sequencing efforts aimed at improving assembly quality and filling the gaps in the fish phylogeny, in parallel to the evolution of sequencing and assembly technologies, will enhance our ability to answer open evolutionary questions in bony fish and provide genomic tools to boost fish production.

Indexed as

FishesGenomeAnimalsGenomicsPhylogenyassembly qualitybony fishcomparative genomicsgenomesphylogeny

Identifiers

PMID41848019
PMCPMC13521744

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.