ReviewJournal of fish biology2026
Bony fish genomes: Status and gaps.
Review in Journal of fish biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Bony fish constitute an exceptionally species-rich group of aquatic vertebrates, comprising more than 95% of all living fish. The adaptive processes on the diversity of environments they inhabit make them a highly diverse group from taxonomic, morphological and evolutionary standpoints. Furthermore, among their members we find species of high economic value for global aquaculture and fisheries. This has attracted the attention of multiple research fields, from ecology or evolutionary biology to comparative genomics. However, deep biological or evolutionary studies require suitable genomic resources, particularly high-quality reference genomes, across multiple species and taxonomic groups. Here, we revise the current status of open access bony fish genome assemblies, with special emphasis on existing gaps throughout their phylogeny. Recently, there has been a boom of information and up to 1744 genomes are available, largely released in the last 5 years. They are distributed across 67 of the 72 recognized orders, where Cichliformes, Perciformes, Siluriformes, Cypriniformes and Cyprinodontiformes appear overrepresented, and across 268 families out of the 514 recognized. Overall, these figures cover around 5% of all described bony fish species. Despite five orders and 14 order-level incertae sedis families (mostly percomorphs) lacking genomic representation, high-throughput sequencing data for most gaps are available in the Sequence Read Archive repository of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Future sequencing efforts aimed at improving assembly quality and filling the gaps in the fish phylogeny, in parallel to the evolution of sequencing and assembly technologies, will enhance our ability to answer open evolutionary questions in bony fish and provide genomic tools to boost fish production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.