ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2026
Combining Genomics With Lipid and Inflammatory Biomarkers to Predict Coronary Artery Disease Risk: UK Biobank Study.
Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) polygenic risk score (PRS), low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) are biomarkers that predict CAD. It is unclear whether integrating genomics with lipid and inflammatory biomarkers could complement traditional risk scores in identifying people at risk of CAD.
objectivesThis study assesses the predictive value of CAD PRS, LDL-C, Lp(a), and hsCRP for incident CAD across different age and sex groups.
methodsParticipants (n = 215,695) from the UK Biobank aged 40 to 69 years with baseline CAD PRS, LDL-C, Lp(a), and hsCRP values were followed for 12 years to assess the incidence of CAD. We evaluated a multivariable-adjusted Cox model that included all 4 biomarkers, net reclassification index, C-statistics, and population attributable risk across different age and sex groups.
resultsOver a 12-year follow-up, 4,721 men and 2,425 women developed CAD. The HRs for incident CAD associated with each biomarker elevation were 1.79 (95% CI: 1.70-1.89) for CAD PRS, 1.60 (95% CI: 1.48-1.66) for LDL-C, 1.20 (95% CI: 1.12-1.29) for Lp(a), and 1.64 (95% CI: 1.57-1.72) for hsCRP. CAD PRS demonstrated a stronger association in men (HR per SD: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.45-1.54) than women (HR per SD: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.31-1.44; P-interaction ≤ 0.001). All biomarkers conferred greater HRs at younger ages (P < 0.0001). Individuals with all biomarkers elevated had a 4.65-fold increased risk of CAD compared with those with no elevated biomarkers. A combined 4-biomarker model had a higher C-statistic of 0.753 compared with the pooled cohort equations (C-statistic of 0.740). The C-statistic of the combined 4-biomarker model was also higher in younger individuals in both sexes and yielded a 32.0% continuous net reclassification index when compared with the pooled cohort equations.
conclusionsCAD PRS, LDL-C, hsCRP, and Lp(a) show independent age- and sex-specific associations with CAD. Measuring all 4 biomarkers may improve midlife CAD risk prediction for both male and female patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.