Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41848550›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2026

Proprioceptive integration in motor control.

Erik Skjoldan Mortensen, Mark Schram Christensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Proprioceptive integration in motor control.The Journal of physiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Erik Skjoldan MortensenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6540-8563
Mark Schram ChristensenDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 2A, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Carlsberg Foundation CF22-0941Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 0132-00141BUniversity of Copenhagen DATA+
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Muscle vibration alters both perceived limb position and velocity by increasing muscle spindle afferent firing rates. In particular the type Ia afferents are affected, which mainly encode muscle stretch velocity. Predictive frameworks of sensorimotor control, such as Active Inference and Optimal Feedback Control, suggest that velocity signals should inform position estimates. Such a function would predict that errors in perceived limb position and velocity should be correlated, but this prediction remains empirically underexplored. We hypothesised that an online evaluation of the integral of sensed velocity influences the perceived arm position during active movements. Using a virtual reality-based reaching task we investigated how vibration-biased proprioceptive feedback influences voluntary movement control and inference of arm position and movement. Our results suggest that muscle vibration biases perceived movement velocity, with downstream effects on perceived limb position and reflexive corrections of movement speed. We found that (i) antagonist vibration during active movement caused participants to overestimate their movement speed while also slowing down, (ii) movement speed and endpoint errors were correlated, with muscle vibration affecting both in congruent directions and (iii) adjustments in movement speed to muscle vibration are sufficiently fast to be reflexive. Together these findings support the hypothesis that proprioceptive velocity signals are integrated to augment inference of position, consistent with predictive frameworks of sensorimotor control. KEY POINTS: During movement without visual feedback, the central nervous system (CNS) has access to both position- and velocity-based proprioceptive signals, which are used to estimate limb state. Muscle vibration biases the perception of limb position, as seen in the classically observed pattern of biased endpoint errors, through the stimulation of primary (type Ia) muscle spindles, primarily a velocity sensor. We investigated how proprioceptive velocity signals affect position estimation during movement by applying muscle vibration while measuring perceived movement speed, actual movement speed and endpoint errors in a virtual reality (VR)-based reaching task. We show that errors in perceived limb position and velocity are correlated during active movements, consistent with predictive frameworks of sensorimotor control. These findings support the idea that the CNS maintains a self-consistent estimate of limb state across both position and velocity domains.

Indexed as

Muscle, SkeletalProprioceptionAdultFemaleHumansMaleMovementMuscle SpindlesVibrationYoung AdultIa afferentinferencemotor controlmovement speedmuscle spindlemuscle tendon vibrationperceptionposition estimationpredictive codingproprioceptionsensorimotor controlsensory integrationvelocity estimation

Identifiers

PMID41848550
PMCPMC13082185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.