ArticleEpilepsia open2026
Practical consensus recommendations for polytherapy involving stiripentol in Dravet syndrome: A nominal group approach.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing polytherapy management for Dravet syndrome in the United States: A National Expert Consensus.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesDravet syndrome (DS) is a drug-resistant developmental and epileptic encephalopathy, often requiring three or more antiseizure medications (ASMs). Consequently, the therapeutic landscape is highly complex, combining DS-specific agents (stiripentol, STP; cannabidiol, CBD; fenfluramine, FFA), non-specific ASMs, and non-pharmacologic options such as dietary therapy or neuromodulation. In addition, recognition of patients' changing needs across the lifespan, together with the essential contribution of caregiver education to effective treatment oversight-including awareness of potential drug-drug interactions and adverse events-emphasizes the value of an integrated and forward-looking approach. A consensus initiative was developed to guide clinicians in the management of patients with DS, with a particular focus on STP-containing regimens.
methodsBased on a literature review and clinical vignette discussions, a nominal group of five international DS experts developed 38 statements across six themes: (i) general principles, (ii) guiding physicians to empower families, (iii) STP as add-on to specific and non-specific Dravet ASMs, (iv) FFA in regimens containing STP, (v) CBD in regimens containing STP, and (vi) patient follow-up during treatment initiation. Statements were scored on a 9-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree, 9 = strongly agree) first by the nominal group and then by an international panel of 59 DS clinicians. Consensus was defined as ≥75% rating ≥7 and/or a median ≥8.
resultsThirty-four of the 38 statements (89%) reached consensus among both the nominal group and the international panel; one did not reach consensus in either, and three reached consensus only among the nominal group. Both panels agreed on the importance of involving families in treatment decisions and follow-up, as well as on key aspects of polytherapy management, including ASM initiation, treatment adjustments, and adverse event management. SIGNIFICANCE: This international consensus integrates evidence and clinical expertise to establish shared principles that address a long-standing gap in the polytherapeutic management of Dravet syndrome. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Dravet syndrome is a rare and severe form of epilepsy that begins in early childhood, with seizures that often persist throughout life. Because the disease is highly drug resistant, most patients are treated with polytherapy, making clinical management complex for clinicians. This consensus brings together published evidence and expert experience to provide practical guidance on the management of polytherapy in Dravet syndrome, supporting clinicians in optimizing patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.