Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849088›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2026

Statin use and risk of contralateral breast cancer: an updated cohort study with landmark analysis.

Charlotte Skriver, Giulia Corn, Jakob H Viuff, Deirdre Cronin-Fenton, Signe Borgquist, Sara Alkner, Lisa Rydén, Jonas Manjer, Ylva Heyman, Maj-Britt R Jensen and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Charlotte SkriverDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark. skriver@cancer.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0774-4259
Giulia CornDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jakob H ViuffDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Deirdre Cronin-FentonDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Signe BorgquistDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Sara AlknerDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lisa RydénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas ManjerDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Ylva HeymanDepartment of Haematology, Oncology, and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Maj-Britt R JensenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent EjlertsenDanish Breast Cancer Group, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels KromanDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Susanne RosthøjDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Søren FriisDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lene MellemkjærDanish Cancer Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

Kræftens Bekæmpelse R231-A13964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Statins may have anti-cancer effects against breast cancer, but evidence regarding their influence on the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) remains inconclusive. In this updated study, incorporating a larger sample, extended follow-up, and landmark analyses, we reevaluated the association between post-diagnosis statin use and CBC incidence among women with breast cancer. Utilising the Danish Breast Cancer Group clinical database, we ascertained data on a nationwide cohort of women aged ≥ 20 years and diagnosed with primary invasive unilateral breast cancer between 1996 and 2019. Data on tumour characteristics, drug use, primary breast cancer therapy, and socioeconomic parameters were retrieved from nationwide health and administrative registries. Using Cox regression, we estimated multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for CBC through 2021 associated with post-diagnosis statin use (≥ 1 prescription) defined at landmark time points of 1, 5, and 10 years after first primary breast cancer. Follow-up began at each respective landmark. Among 77,675 women with breast cancer, 2758 were diagnosed with CBC during median follow-up of 7.2 years (interquartile range 3.4-12.0 years) from the 1-year landmark. Post-diagnosis statin use was not associated with the rate of CBC at any of the landmarks (1-year: HR, 1.01; 95% CI 0.88-1.16; 5-year: 1.08; 0.95-1.24; 10-year: 0.95; 0.80-1.12). Additionally, we observed no consistent trends with duration or consistency of post-diagnosis statin use. Stratification by oestrogen receptor status and pre-diagnosis statin use had no substantial influence on the associations. In conclusion, our study did not support an inverse association between statin use and CBC incidence following a breast cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsNeoplasms, Second PrimaryAdultAgedCohort StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesRisk FactorsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsBreast cancerCohort studyContralateral breast cancerLandmark analysisStatins

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.