ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2026
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for predicting teicoplanin plasma concentrations in intensive care unit patients with pulmonary infections: a retrospective study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTeicoplanin is widely used to treat pulmonary infections, particularly in critically ill patients with gram-positive bacterial infections. However, its plasma concentration varies substantially between individuals owing to heterogeneity in renal function, comorbidities, and concomitant medications, leading to subtherapeutic or toxic exposures. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) remains the standard approach for individualized dosing; however, its application in intensive care unit (ICU) is limited by resource and timing constraints. Hence, developing reliable predictive models to estimate teicoplanin plasma concentrations could enhance the precision and efficiency of TDM, and support pharmacist-led dosing decisions.
aimThis study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML)-based models to predict the teicoplanin plasma concentration in ICU patients with pulmonary infections using real-world clinical data, thereby advancing personalized antibiotic therapy in clinical pharmacy practice.
methodThis retrospective cohort study was conducted between June 2018 and September 2023 in ICU patients receiving teicoplanin therapy at a tertiary hospital in China. After the univariate analysis to exclude irrelevant factors, sequential forward selection was performed to identify the optimal feature subset. The dataset was divided into a training set (80%) and a test set (20%), and ten ML algorithms were developed to predict teicoplanin plasma concentrations. Model performance was evaluated by ten-fold cross-validation of the training set and validated using an independent external cohort.
resultsA total of 270 eligible patients were included in the training and test sets, and additional 118 patients formed the external validation cohort. Seven variables were identified as the most predictive features: daily dose, diabetes, hemodialysis, imipenem, human serum albumin, urea, and red blood cell count. Among the ten algorithms tested, the TabNet model achieved the best predictive performance on the test set (R
conclusionThis study developed a TabNet model based on real-world data, which can accurately and interpretably predict the teicoplanin plasma concentration of patients with pulmonary infection in the ICU. The derived online prediction tool provides references for the application of artificial intelligence-assisted precision medicine in antibacterial treatment and the optimization of drug monitoring for ICU patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.