Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41849130›Full record

Observational studyHigh blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension2026

Hypertension Treatment with Angiotensin Receptor Blockers and Other Antihypertensive Agents: A Real-World Registry from a High-Volume Specialized Center Over TwoDecades.

Giuliano Tocci, Giulia Nardoianni, Barbara Pala, Marco Russo, Giovanni Marco Dutti, Gallo Giovanna, Allegra Battistoni, Emanuele Barbato, Massimo Volpe

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Giuliano TocciHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy. giuliano.tocci@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0635-4921
Giulia NardoianniHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Barbara PalaHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Marco RussoHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni Marco DuttiHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Gallo GiovannaHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Allegra BattistoniHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Emanuele BarbatoHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Massimo VolpeHypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, University of Rome Sapienza, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients with difficult to control hypertension (HTN) are often referred by general practitioners to specialized centers to estimate global cardiovascular (CV) risk profile, evaluate hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD), and optimize antihypertensive therapy. This referral provides a unique opportunity to analyse patients with high CV risk and HTN in a real-world setting, characterized by the rigorous adoption of uniform and state-of-the-art procedures by expert personnel.

aimTo examine (1) global CV risk profile, office and out-of-office blood pressure (BP) levels, and markers of HMOD in adult patients referred to a high-volume European Hypertension center; (2) to evaluate how these clinical parameters impact on the choice of different antihypertensive therapies.

methodsAn observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in adult patients of both sexes, aged ≥ 18 years, with essential treated hypertension, who were consecutively evaluated at the Excellence Hypertension Center at Sant'Andrea Hospital in Rome, Italy. Office and out-of-office BP levels were measured, and different hypertension phenotypes were set according to European guidelines. CV risk profile was estimated according using SCORE2. Only patients with treated HTN were selected for the analysis and stratified according to antihypertensive therapies: (1) angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); (2) angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors; (3) other drugs (including diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, alpha-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists).

resultsFrom an overall database of 11,168 outpatients, a total of 5,677 patients with treated HTN were analysed (46.3% females, age 63.6 ± 13.1 years, BMI 27.4 ± 4.8 kg/m2, office BP 140.6 ± 17.5/85.5 ± 11.5 mmHg, 24-hour BP 128.7 ± 13.7/77.2 ± 9.7 mmHg, SCORE2 5.4 ± 4.3%). Among these, 52.9% were treated with ARBs, 30.2% with ACE inhibitors and 17.0% with other drugs. Patients treated with ARBs were more frequently males, and significantly older, had more frequently obesity (P < 0.001), dyslipidaemia (p < 0.001), and diabetes (p < 0.001) than those treated with other drug classes. They also had more frequently CV comorbidities (P < 0.001) and resistant HTN (P < 0.001). They received more BP lowering agents (P < 0.001), being more frequently treated with triple (P < 0.001), quadruple (P < 0.001), or more complex (P < 0.001) combination therapies. Comparable office and out-of-office BP control were recorded between patients treated with ARBs and those patients managed with either ACE inhibitors or other drugs.

conclusionsAmong adult outpatients referred to an excellence hypertension center, the majority were treated with ARBs, alone or in combination therapies. ARB-treated patients presented more frequently CV risk factors, comorbidities, and difficult-to-treat HTN.

Indexed as

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHypertensionAdultAgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHeart Disease Risk FactorsHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin II Type 1 Receptor BlockersAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsAngiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)Antihypertensive drugsBlood pressureCardiovascularHypertensionOlmesartanRisk factors

Identifiers

PMID41849130
PMCPMC13283145

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.